What’s it all about, Arizona?

The road from Mesa to Apache Junction, AZ. (May 14, 2010)

When I agreed to fly from the DC Metro Area to Phoenix and help my cousin, Edna, drive back to Ohio, I was happy to have the chance to spend so much time with a very dear relative on what I imagined would be a great cross country adventure.

Since my travel plans were unfolding around the same time as the news broke about Arizona’s controversial immigration legislation (Senate Bill 1070), I was hoping to gain some insight into the brouhaha from the state’s residents.  Before I left, I invited friends and others to comment on the issue or suggest a question I might ask Arizonans during my brief visit to Mesa and the Grand Canyon.

The few emotional responses I received from well-meaning friends were disappointing.  One woman said to ask if they would be passing out Klan hoods too.  Another said the police could jail families mistakenly.  One man compared the police asking for someone’s papers to checking if  a person’s gun is registered.  Someone else forwarded a link to horror stories claiming abuse of undocumented women and children, such as a Latina woman in Arizona who was allegedly jailed and held in chains while in labor.

As a researcher and a journalist,  I  was seeking a neutral probe that would elicit honest, thoughtful responses.  Given my limited time and perhaps lack of imagination,  I went with, “I’d like to know what you think about Arizona’s new immigration law.”

I soon discovered that most people, here and there, have a difficult time expressing their thoughts about the key points of the issue.  Depending on their political leanings, their first instinct is to  repeat various popular talking points being promulgated by the right or left wing media.

So far, I haven’t spoken with anyone who has actually read the legislation.  It seems that when US Attorney General Eric Holder commented about the bill,  he had not read the legislation either.  But you can click this link if you’d like to read it.  According to Section I of the document, this is the intent of the law:

“The legislature finds that there is a compelling interest in the cooperative enforcement of federal immigration laws throughout all of Arizona. The legislature declares that the intent of this act is to make attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona. The provisions of this act are intended to work together to discourage and deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens and economic activity by persons unlawfully present in the United States.”

As it’s written, the intent doesn’t seem unreasonable or draconian. And the law simply requires enforcement of the federal law prohibiting people from being in the United States illegally. But Arizonans have stirred up some fierce controversy with their new immigration law.

It was shocking to discover that this issue is almost impossible to talk about rationally and calmly. Perhaps I was naive?

I talked with a few Caucasian Arizonans about the law,  after I assured them I really wanted to know what they thought, and they were satisfied that I wasn’t laying a political trap for them.  But when I tried to express their concerns to one sincere progressive friend, I couldn’t complete a sentence without her cutting me off with emotional responses about racial profiling and discrimination. This topic really pushes people’s buttons.

As I considered how to write about this hot topic, I realized that in many peoples’ view  I couldn’t express what the Caucasian residents of Arizona had told me without being labeled a racist because I’m a Caucasian, natural born American citizen.  And I find this deeply troubling.

Arizona has real problems with people crossing into the state illegally through its porous southern border with Mexico. Will concerned Americans ever be able to move beyond the talking points to honestly discuss the issues and propose some ethical solutions?

~N. Logsdon Mandelkorn

8 responses to “What’s it all about, Arizona?

  1. I like your blog, natural and beutiful.

  2. Hippieprof,
    I understand your concerns about the potential for the police in Arizona to overreach and abuse their powers. We see evidence of police brutality all the time in every state.

    Raiding a home and shooting a small child to death in her bed is a heinous act, which we learned a police officer recently did in Tennessee.

    Inquiring about someone’s immigration status who looks like a particular ethnic group may be offensive (possibly racist), but it just doesn’t compare to manslaughter.

    After reading an op-ed on the Arizona issue written by a police officer, I was reminded that we need to support the police who are simply trying to do the jobs they are trained to do and to not stereotype them as “dangerous” or the “bad guys.”

    We need to take a step back and try to consider the whole picture, if that’s possible.

    • Nancy,

      Sorry for the delayed response – it was a busy holiday weekend.

      I am curious – do you have a link to that op-ed you mention?

      I am absolutely in agreement that we should not demonize the police here. Most cops are in fact decent people trying to do a difficult, dangerous, and stressful job.

      Racial profiling is a big thing to me, though. The college at which I teach is in a predominately white town – and my African-American students are regularly harassed by the local police – even when they are walking on their own campus. No – it is not as big a deal as manslaughter – but it is demeaning and offensive.

      I worry that the new law will simply open the door for m0re of this.

      — hp

      • HP,
        I understand your concern. I have been inclined to view the police as potential harassers. So that’s why I really appreciated being able to read about the potential impact of the bill from a police officer’s point of view.

        Here’s the link:

        This is a complicated issue. It’s really unfair to require Arizona’s police force to do Immigration’s job. And all the inflamed rhetoric is causing tensions to flare, which also contributes to the danger in situations when they are questioning someone. It’s just too easy to play the race card. The moment it’s played, rational thought goes out the window.

        I look forward to reading what you think.

  3. I do think rational discussion of the law is quite possible. However, as you note, it is sometimes hard to find.

    I indeed have read the law, and I have written about it in my own blog, here:


    My worry about the law is that it makes it awfully easy to find “probable cause” for conducting a search – merely a gesture can be so interpreted.

    — hippieprof

    • Thanks for your comment, hippieprof! I like your blog. But I think the joke you used to illustrate your point only adds to the obfuscation about the issue.

      • Nancy said: I like your blog. But I think the joke you used to illustrate your point only adds to the obfuscation about the issue.

        The joke was intended to get people’s attention and to be a little lighthearted about such a serious issue. The intent was certainly not to obfuscate.

        Joke or no joke, I have read the law and frankly it scares me. It gives the police some unprecedented powers that indeed could be used for the purpose of racial profiling and worse.

        Yes – I know the law prohibits racial profiling. But, police profile now even though they are not supposed to – so I really doubt it will stop now. In fact, my guess is it will get worse.

        — hp

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s